![im pro gmo im pro gmo](https://ud-nutrition.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ShapePro.jpg)
I hope you’ll take the time to read Jeffrey Smith’s article in full, visit the website of the Institute for Responsible Technology and give yourself a thorough education on the dangers of GM foods and how to avoid them.The anti-GM camp had reason to cheer a few weeks earlier as well, when Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh abruptly put a moratorium on an insect-resistant variety of aubergine seed, known as Bt brinjal, on the eve of its much-hyped launch. In an age where “panels of experts” are paid by the companies whose products they promote, the average citizen needs to exercise a great deal of intelligence to avoid being poisoned. But thankfully, propaganda wasn’t one of the elements competing for their attention. So much for Tribe and Chassy’s criticism.īack in the day, when hunter-gatherers were making difficult decisions about what to put in their mouths, they had to weigh a lot of factors. In fact, in 2003 the medical journal Nutrition and Health hailed the study as "remarkable in that the experimental conditions were varied and several ways were found by which to demonstrate possible health effects of GM foods." There was no reason for him to purposefully skew the design of the study. He was chosen for the study because lectin, the protein added to the GM potatoes, was his specialty. Pusztai designed and carried out the study, he had no history of non-GMO advocacy. It’s also important to note that when Dr. Furthermore, the design was explicitly approved in advance by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)-the UK government's main funding body for the biological sciences.” Pusztai's research design had already been used in over 50 peer-reviewed published studies conducted at the Rowett Institute, the most prestigious nutritional institute in the UK. Among the highlights: the “experts” cited by Chassy and Tribe are actually members of the Royal Society, who’s explicit purpose according to UK newspaper The Guardian "is to mould scientific and public opinion with a pro-biotech line," and to "counter opposing scientists and environmental groups."Īccording to Smith, “Dr. Smith breaks down the claims into a longer list, and devotes multiple paragraphs to exposing each one. In their list of accusations, they claim that the design of the study was flawed, the results actually indicated that there was no difference between animals fed GMO potatoes and animals fed non-GMO potatoes, and that “experts” said no scientific conclusion could be drawn from the study. Pusztai’s study: Smith deals primarily with a website constructed by Bruce Chassy and David Tribe, two pro-GMO advocates who published a number of claims about Dr. Pusztai’s defense, answering point by point the different challenges made to Dr. Jeffrey Smith, whose work we’ve been featuring over the last week, comes to Dr. Not surprisingly, he immediately came under attack from proponents of biotechnology, who continue to try to discredit him. Armand Pusztai, the scientist who blew the whistle on genetically engineered foods and became a hero in Europe: …. In Wednesday's article, Shelly told the story of Dr. If you have two scientists, and one of them is making money selling you his science experiment and the other one risked his job to tell you that the science experiment is dangerous, I’d trust the second one.Īs Shelly explained, that hypothetical scenario is actually a reality.But I’m not going to eat their science experiment. If someone wants to go shooting foreign genes into DNA strands, that’s their freedom. I learned in 9 th grade that DNA is very complex.Personally, my intuition tells me two things: In this case, we might use our intuition to decide whom to trust. Unfortunately, a lot of people are making a lot of money on GMOs and institutions that are intended to act as unbiased authorities – such as the FDA - have become woefully compromised. African Chickens Added To List Of Animals That Reject GMOs.īut anecdotal evidence is not conclusive, so we might want to hear from authorities.
![im pro gmo im pro gmo](http://www.artikelmagazin.de/wp-content/uploads/transgener-mais.jpg)
![im pro gmo im pro gmo](https://www.depotvergleich.com/wp-content/uploads/gmo-webseite.png)
Cows And Hogs Choose Natural Corn Over GM Corn.First, we can ask an obvious question: do other animals eat this food? Jeffrey Smith has documented numerous situations where wild and domesticated animals go out of their way to avoid GM foods. In the case of deciding whether or not we are willing to consume genetically modified organisms, we have to employ all of our truth-seeking faculties. Sometimes it comes down to one of the most basic questions of human life: “Will this food kill me or not? Truth is not just a philosophical concept. Sometimes we seek it through prayer or intuition, other times through hearing from authorities and other times through our own observation. Every human being has an innate desire to know the truth, and we use different methods to seek out truth at different times.